Is the Free Ride Worth It?

A motorcycle manufacturer in India, with over two million loyalty customers, has one of the largest customers bases for a loyalty programme. The customer proposition is quite simple and relevant to the target audience. However what makes it different, is that its a paid programme. Customers need to pay upfront for a three year membership.

Most loyalty programmes have very low entry barriers / qualification criteria for its customers. The benefits via ease of enrolment for the customer & for the brand owner easy access to a large customer base to which it can communicate and potentially convert to increased wallet share and hence revenues are quite obvious.

In any loyalty programme, there is a clear pyramid of customers that is formed within 18 - 24 months, wherein the Pareto principle quickly falls in line...Less than 20% of the customers contribute to the value from the overall base.

Which takes me to the set of (existential) questions.....
1. Do they clearly understand the value proposition...OR rather...Do they take the time enough to understand the benefits of the programme?
2. Does the customer actually value the benefits that your are offering her...(OR is that too brave a question to ask for the programme manager?)
3. Does this customer take your programme seriously enough?

The third question is the most vital for the success of any programme. It is vital that the customers views a clear give and take in this relationship and has his skin in the game. You may believe that her business over the life of the programme is the "skin", but it may just not be it.

Most loyalty programmes have attained success via word of mouth from its loyal consumers and not as much from the programme communication. Hence the programme is always susceptible to a risk of failure if the word of mouth does not reach the customer in adequate and frequent dosage.

So, why leave it to chance? Pricing the access to a loyalty programme has the following potential benefits:
a. It ensures that the customer clearly understands and believes in the value of the programme
b. Ensures that the organisation stakeholders are more involved in the customer engagement and education at the time of enrolment
c. Gives your P&L immense latitude, by covering huge administrative and financial costs that you would incur.

Pricing a programme would face huge resistance across internal and external stakeholders, the programme size build up would take substantially longer, but the P&L does look rather different.

Take your customer seriously, but they should take you seriously too!

p.s. There is a difference between a customer communication programme and a loyalty programme...

The Walls Come Tumbling Down.

I can recall when I first ventured into loyalty marketing there were clear lines of delineation between the various advertising disciplines and agencies.

General advertising was the “brand” stuff, home of the big TV budgets and glossy print advertisements. DM or direct marketing was advertising that called for a response, whether it was via a mail package, banner ad or DRTV spot.

And then there was loyalty marketing, which I soon learned had a different perch in the advertising hierarchy. While working in direct marketing we often complained about getting the budget crumbs from the general agency, in loyalty we often had to settle for a single crumb.

Furthermore, the CMO at our client companies were often not even involved in the loyalty marketing effort, as he or she busied themselves with the more high profile brand work. Often, the management duties for loyalty were assigned to a marketing subordinate well down the hallway from the corner office.

For one creative assignment it wasn’t uncommon to have three different agencies and three different creative directions involved. (Four agencies if a digital shop was in the mix.)

But today the walls are tumbling down.

I’ve just wrapped up a TV campaign for 21st Century auto insurance comprised of TV spots that push the brand while selling (brand DRTV). In addition, the key premise of the campaign is being integrated into the company Web site, and will soon appear in customer e-mails, acquisition direct mail and even viral videos.

In the past, this work might have been spread over three or four different agencies. In this case, it’s being done by one. The result: a stronger, better integrated, more coherent campaign.

Today, especially as new forms of digital media enter the marketing fray, the old dividing lines between general and direct and loyalty and digital are becoming hazier than ever. And for all involved, that’s a very good thing.

Loyalty advice from Haruki Murakami.

I’ve been reading the memoir What I Talk About When I Talk About Running by the celebrated novelist Haruki Murakami. A good quick read, especially since Murakami writes about two of my favorite personal pursuits, writing and running. (Not to mention the pleasure afforded by an ice cold beer after a long run.)

In one passage, the author touches on a subject I didn’t expect: loyalty marketing. It seems that before becoming a novelist, Murakami ran his own small jazz bar in Tokyo. He tells of learning the following important business lesson:

If one out of 10 enjoyed the place and said he’d come again, that was enough. If one out of 10 was a repeat customer, then the business would survive. To put it the other way, it didn’t matter if nine out of 10 didn’t like my bar. Still, I had to make sure that the one person who did like the place really liked it.

It's a point we might ponder when looking at our clients’ business or our own. Is there one customer in 10 who really likes our business? If not, how do we create them? Or if we already have them, how do we get them to spread the word to others?

Tom Rapsas, Creative Director-Writer-Strategist, tomrapsas@gmail.com